Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

About

Study of Islamic Education

Study of Islamic Education Management

Multi-Cultural Education Review

Religious Studies

Cultural Studies

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

1. Any incoming articles will be reviewed by reviewers
2. In the review process, reviewers give consideration regarding the    appropriateness between title, abstract, discussion and conclusion. In addition, the reviewer also provides consideration related to novelty, scientific impact and reference used.

 

Publication Frequency

JANUARY-JUNE

JULY-DECEMBER

Publish on June Vol. 1 No. 1

Publish on December Vol. 1 No. 2

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung terhadap kontennya dengan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara umum gratis untuk mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

 

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed HIKMAH is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

 

Department of Education  as publisher of HIKMAH takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

 

Publication decisions

The editor of the HIKMAH is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Journal Template

JUDUL DITULIS HURUF CAPITAL DENGAN FONT ARIAL NARROW 12 CETAK TEBAL (MAKSIMAL 12 KATA)

 

Penulis11), Penulis22), {Font Arrial Narrow 12 cetak tebal dan nama tanpa gelar & tanpa} disingkat)

Nama Fakultas, Nama Perguruan Tinggi, Alamat Lengkap (penulis 1)

email: penulis@yahoo.com

Nama Fakultas, Nama Perguruan Tinggi, Alamat Lengkap (penulis 2)

email: penulis@yahoo.com

 

 

Abstract (Arrial Narrow 11 Cetak Tebal dan miring) posisi tengah

 

Abstrak ditulis dalam bahasa Indonesia yang berisikan isu-isu pokok/permasalahan, tujuan penelitian/kepenulisan, metode/pendekatan, hasil/pembahasan. Abstrak ditulis dalam satu alenia, tidak lebih 200 kata. (Arrial Narrow 11, spasi 1, cetak miring, maksimal 1 halaman)

 

Kata Kunci: Maksimal 5 kata kunci dipisahkan dengan tanda koma (sesuikan dengan ruang lingkup artikel, Font Arrial Narrow 11 Spasi 1, dan cetak miring)

 

 

PENDAHULUAN {Arrial Narrow 12 Bold}

Pendahuluan mencakup latar belakang atas suatu permasalahan serta urgensi dan rasionalisasi kegiatan (penelitian atau pengabdian). Selain itu, latar belakang isu-isu permasalahan memasukkan isu-isu permasalahan yang sedang dikaji. {Arrial Narrow 12, Spasi 1,5}

 

KAJIAN TEORI

Kajian teori berupa paparan teori-teori yang digunakan dalam melakukan analisis permasalahan. Teori-teori dijabarkan, diuraikan sesuai kebutuhan dengan singkat padat dan jelas dengan tidak mengurangi substansi teori utama. {Arrial Narrow 12, Spasi 1,5}

 

METODE PENELITIAN

Metode penelitian memaparkan pendekatan, rancangan kegiatan, ruang lingkup dan objek, tempat, teknik pengumpulan data, defiisi operasional variable penelitian, dan teknik analisis. {Arrial Narrow 12, Spasi 1,5, metode penelitian digunakan untuk artikel hasil penelitian dan jika kajian teori tidak perlu digunakan}

 

HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN

Bagian ini menyajikan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan. Hasil penelitian dapat dilengkapi dengan table, grafik (gambar), dan/atau bagan. Bagian pembahasan memaparkan hasil pengolahan data, menginterpretasikan penemuan secara logis dan mendalam. Jika tulisan dari hasil kajian teori, maka uraian pembahasan teori-teori secara mendalam. {Arrial Narrow 12, Spasi 1,5}

 

KESIMPULAN

Kesimpulan berisi rangkuman singkat atas hasil kajian/penelitian dan pembahasan. {Arrial Narrow 12, Spasi 1,5, Secara keseluruhan baik pendahuluan, kajian teori, metodologi, hasil & pembahasan dan kesimpulan minimal 10 halaman sampai 25 halaman}

 

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Nanang Fattah. 2000. Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Mappanganro. 1996. Eksistensi Madrasah dalam Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Makassar: CV Berkah Utami.

 

 

Cara kepenulisan FOOTNOTES {hanya menggunakan Ibid dalam pengulangan}