SUSTAINABLE ISLAMIC EDUCATION LEARNING WITH CONNECTIVISM APPROACH

Albert Albert, Irwandi Irwandi, Arman Husni, Hamdi Pranata

Abstract


Education institutions can adopt various pedagogical approaches, principles and methods used by other  training institutions in continuous learning. These methods may include utilizing digital technology and online communication to facilitate distance learning and quick access to relevant information. This research empirically explores the principles of connectivism implemented in the learning and teaching conducted online at Ma'had Aly Integrated Pesantren Serambi Mekkah Padangpanjang, West Sumatra Province. Types of research is qualititaive ,and narrative descriptive as research analysis techniques. The research findings show that connectivism approach can be a suitable conceptual framework and motivate mahasantri to develop knowledge through digital, discussion and social networking with the concept of sustainability. The principles of connectivism can help musyrif to develop a learning environment where mahasantri can add to their understanding and prior knowledge through online interaction and by accessing digital knowledge sources.


Keywords


Sustainable PAI Learning; Connectivisme Approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldahdouh, A. A. (2018). Jumping from one resource to another: How do students navigate learning networks? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17.

Ahel, O., & Schirmer, M. (2023). Education for sustainable development through researchbased learning in an online environment. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(1), 118–140

Bien, C., & Sassen, R. (2020). Sensemaking of a sustainability transition by higher education institution leaders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120299.

Bush, D., Sieber, R., Seiler, G., & Chandler, M. (2016). The teaching of anthropogenic climate change and earth science via technologyenabled inquiry education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(3), 159–174.

Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & ZawackiRichter, O. (2018).Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(48), 1–20.

Dunaway, M. K. (2011). Connectivism learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes.Reference Services Review, 39(4), 675–685.

Dziubaniuk et al. Int J Educ Technol High Educ (2023) 20:20 Page 21 of 23

Fauzi, A., Baharun, H., Mundiri, A., & Manshur, U. (2018, November). E-Learning in pesantren: Learning transformation based on the value of pesantren. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1114, No. 1, p. 012062). IOP Publishing.

Filho, L. W. (2020). Accelerating the implementation of the SDGs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(3), 507–511.

Hidayati, D. A., Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., Miharja, F. J., & Fauzi, A. (2020, September). Pendidikan Lingkungan di Pondok Pesantren pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi.

Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage

Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19–38.

Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1–13. Dziubaniuk et al. Int J Educ Technol High Educ (2023) 20:20 Page 22 of 23

Kordrostami, M., & Seitz, V. (2022). Faculty online competence and student afective engagement in online learning.Marketing Education Review, 32(3), 240–254.

Ningrum, Michelia, and Enung Hasanah. "Manajemen kurikulum dan implementasi education for sustainable development pada perguruan tinggi." Didaktis: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan 21, no. 2 (2021).

Ngabekti, D. S. (2013). Konsep Pendidikan Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (Kasus Pondok Pesantren Modern Selamat Kendal) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).

Niu, S. J., Niemi, H., Harju, V., & Pehkonen, L. (2021). Finnish student teachers’ perceptions of their development of 21stcentury competencies. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(5), 638–653.

Pohan, A. E. (2020). Konsep pembelajaran daring berbasis pendekatan ilmiah. Penerbit CV. Sarnu Untung.

Rumahuru, Y. Z., Siahaya, A., Th, M., & Ambarita, J. (2021). Transformasi Budaya Pembelajaran Era Kenormalan Baru Pasca Covid-19. Penerbit Adab.

Ramdhan, I. F., Putri, D. S., Salsabilla, M. N., Mardiyanti, T. P., Sundaningtias, E., & Gibral, A. A. (2022). Manajemen Transformasi Digital Berkelanjutan di Pendidikan Tinggi: Tren Analisis Internasional. In SENAKOTA: Seminar Nasional Ekonomi dan Akuntansi (Vol. 1).

Takala, A., & KorhonenYrjänheikki, K. (2019). A decade of Finnish engineering

Sanjaya, R. (Ed.). (2020). 21 Refleksi Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Darurat. SCU Knowledge Media.

Seatter, C. S., & Ceulemans, K. (2017). Teaching sustainability in higher education: Pedagogical styles that make a diference. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(2), 47–70.

Saykili, A. (2019). Higher education in the digital age: The impact of digital connective technologies. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 2(1), 1–15.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Siemens, G. (2007). Connectivism: Creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In T. Hug (Ed.), Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples (pp. 53–68). Germany: Waxmann.

Sugrah, N. (2019). Implementasi teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran sains. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 19(2), 121-138.

Sterling, S. (2004). Higher education, sustainability and the role of systemic learning. In P. Corcoran & A. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Contestation, critique, practice, and promise (pp. 49–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Vanhorn, S., Ward, S. M., Weismann, K. M., Crandall, H., Reule, J., & Leonard, R. (2019). Exploring active learning theories, practices, and contexts. Communication research trends, 38(3), 5-25.

Widyati, W. (2014). Belajar dan pembelajaran perspektif teori kognitivisme. BIOSEL (Biology Science and Education): Jurnal Penelitian Science dan Pendidikan, 3(2), 177-187.

Yusoff, A. F. M., Hamat, W. N. W., & Basir, N. K. (2019). Penggunaan aplikasi web 2.0 dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran kursus mata pelajaran umum (MPU) di politeknik. e-BANGI, 16(5), 1-13.

Zakir,S.,Defit,S.,&Vitriani,V.(2019). Indeks Kesiapan Perguruan Tinggi dalam Mengimplementasikan Smart Campus. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 6(3),

-276.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.55403/hikmah.v13i1.492

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 HIKMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

situs 138

klik4d